I don’t have much to add to this article, except to suggest that you follow the link and read it in full. It may help you filter out the idiocy you are seeing in the mainstream media these days regarding the stimulus.
The real problem, however, is that the Keynesian model is simply incorrect. It is based on the very crude idea that the economy, as measured in Gross Domestic Product, can be accurately summarized by the following formula: GDP = C+I+G+(X-M). In English, this means the economy is equal to consumer spending (C), plus investment (I), plus government spending (G), plus (exports (X) minus imports (M)). Since government can only control government spending directly, any failure of consumer spending must be compensated by increasing government spending. That is what the $787 billion is nominally intended to do, to make up for the decline in consumer spending.
However, this is complete balderdash, as a third economic theory points out. The Austrian school, to which I myself subscribe, has repeatedly shown that neither monetary nor fiscal policy are capable of doing more than delaying an economic contraction, and that using them to delay contraction only extends and exacerbates the contraction when it eventually arrives. Austrian theory teaches that credit inflation, which is how they describe the monetarist tool of injecting liquidity by cutting interest rates, leads to investment and consumption booms that will inevitably be followed by busts. It is, in fact, the only economic school with a reasonable explanation for the economic cycles so readily seen in the historical data.
This post by the same author, about the column linked above further shows where Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman effectively states, “Though my head is firmly planted in my rear, the planting is less firm than that of other economists of my stature.”
by Carlton Lloyd Smith